Country: Sub-Saharan Africa

Harbingers of doom? bank failures in Africa – how to interpret these

Yesterday, Zambia’s central bank announced it had taken over a commercial bank, Intermarket, after the latter failed to come up with the capital it needed to satisfy new minimum capital requirements. Three weeks ago, a Mozambican bank – Nosso Banco – had its licence cancelled, less than two months after another Mozambican bank, Moza Banco, was placed under emergency administration.

At the end of October, the Bank of Tanzania stepped in to replace the management at Twiga Bancorp, a government-owned financial institution which was reported to have negative capital of TSh21 billion.  A week before that, just over the border in Uganda, Crane Bank, with its estimated 500,000 customers, was taken over by the central bank, having become “seriously undercapitalised”. In DR Congo, the long-running saga of BIAC, the country’s third largest bank, continued in 2016, forced to limit cash withdrawals after the termination of a credit line from the central bank. And in Kenya, Chase Bank collapsed in April, bars after the failure of Imperial.

How are we to interpret this? It seems that 2016 is the year in which latent fragility in Africa’s banking sectors is being laid bare.  After years in which observers have favourably contrasted the relative stability of African banking with the financial sector chaos in Europe and the US, it seems that three critical perils – mismanagement, political interference and economic woes – are conspiring to transform the landscape of African banking into a decidedly treacherous place for depositors and investors.

We have had remarkably few bank failures in Africa in recent years and yet this sudden uptick in stories like Crane and Chase, against a backdrop of economic challenges in many places, raises the question as to whether there is worse to come.

Mismanagement and/or political interference have been at the root of most bank collapses over the past few decades. Martin Brownbridge’s grimly fascinating analysi”https://fsdafrica.org/knowledge-hub/blog/harbingers-of-doom-bank-failures-in-africa-how-to-interpret-these/#_ftn1″ name=”_ftnref1″>[1] on this subject from 1998 concluded that “moral hazard, with the adoption of high-risk lending strategies, in some cases involving insider lending” was behind most of the bank collapses in the 1990s. This certainly resonates today. Catastrophic lapses in governance rather than economic malaise are alleged to be behind the recent Kenyan bank failures (although their shareholders and directors vigorously refute this) – but how else can you explain why a small number of banks fail when the sector as a whole has been returning well over 20% on its equity for the past several years?

There are some excellent programmes like “http://www.centerforfinancialinclusion.org/programs-a-projects/abf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Accions’s Africa Board Fellowship Program, which aims to strengthen capacity at financial institutions because their promoters understand that weak governance undermines trust in the financial system and is therefore very bad for financial inclusion. But it is one thing to know what you’re supposed to do as a bank board director – quite another to actually do it.

Each bank failure seems to have its own special story – and we derive comfort from this. It is somehow reassuring to think that that might be the case because the prospect of a system-wide failure is so awful.

And each country context has particular features that impinge on the stability of the financial system. There are deep concerns in Kenya, for example, that the recent imposition of interest rate caps is going to result in a very messy period of bank failures and/or consolidation.

But are there common patterns that we should be taking note of?  Is there a system-wide issue that we should be facing up to?

Well, one pattern might be positive – that central banks are intervening more, and more quickly, to weed out the miscreants, less cowed by the politicians than they might have been in the past and more concerned to protect their well-earned professional reputations. Another is that central banks are finally implementing the increases in minimum capital requirements which many have been talking about for years with the inevitable intended consequence that some banks will be forced to get out of the market.

These might be two good reasons why we are seeing more collapses. You could say that’s excellent news for the future of African banking. But perhaps only to a point. There is still the risk that the cumulative effect of bank failures as a result of zealous supervisory action causes a loss of faith in the entire system resulting in mass panic and the withdrawal of deposits and credit lines.

Also, the inevitable result of this would be fewer, bigger banks which may have negative consequences for competition and access – altht worth pointing out that Tanzania, which has 55 commercial banks, still only manages to bank around 12% of its adult population (FinScope).

The more concerning issue is the impact of underlying economic weakness. Leaving aside the paradox that some of these bank failures are taking place in economies that are growing quite fast (Kenya and Tanzania forecasting 6-7% GDP growth), lower commodity prices and their pervasive impact across African economies are going to make life much tougher for banks – especially if they are poorly managed and have political skeletons in their cupboards.

One problem we have, especially when economic conditions are changing fast and for the worse (as in Mozambique), is that data is often out of date and is not sufficiently disaggregated. So, when we look at Africa as a whole, or even the banking system of one country as a whole, the averages we tend to look at create a blithely benign picture which masks dramatic variations.

So, non-performing loans (NPLs) across Africa up to014 were a little over 5% but NPLs in Ghana were more like 11-12%. NPLs in Tanzania are currently a little over 8%, yet Twiga Bancorp’s NPL’s were – unbelievably – at 34% in early 2015, according to media reports.

We think the African banking sector is in for a rocky ride in 2017 and 2018 and, in the short term, this is not good news for the real economy. However, one industry that is set to grow, surely, is central banking supervision.

“https://fsdafrica.org/knowledge-hub/blog/harbingers-of-doom-bank-failures-in-africa-how-to-interpret-these/#_ftnref1” name=”_ftn1″>[1] Brownbridge, M (1998): “Financial distress in local banks in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia: Causes and implications for regulatory policy” Development Policy Review, vol. 16, no.

Digitisation of government payments task force benefits from digital money training

Harry Mwangi (R) receiving his certificate from Stephen Mwaura (L), the Head of National Payment Systems at the Central Bank of Kenya during the graduation ceremony in Nairobi

Thursday  14th  July 2016, Nairobi — Financial Sector Deepening Kenya (FSDK), in partnership with FSD Africa and the Digital Frontiers Institute (DFI), held a graduation ceremony at the Serena Hotel for the Digitisation of Government Payments Task Force, who successfully completed the 12-week ‘Certificate in Digital Money’  programme.

Commenting on the programme, Victor Malu, Head of Future Financial Systems at FSD Kenya who also participated in the programme said: “This has been a very exciting 12 weeks. One of the really great aspects of this programme is the sharing of knowledge and experiences both among the participants in Kenya as well those from other countries across the world.”

The certified programme offered by DFI in partnership with the Fletcher School at Tufts University aims at equipping 1,500 digital finance professionals within the next two years with the technical knowledge, vision and skills to drive inclusive innovation in digital finance.

It is estimated that more than a third of the world’s adult population does not have access to basic financial services. In Africa, close to 200 million adults still have no bank accounts to enable them receive loans, send children to school or insure against illness. The training, mentoring and peer networking of DFI’s professional development programme is part of the strategic response to fill the financial inclusion capacity gap in underserved markets over the next five years.

The first cohort of the course, which is delivered using a highly interactive on-line platform, was attended by 125 applicants from 34 countries across six continents, including 21 people from Kenya.  Of this cohort, 31% were female while 69% were male, with 45% coming from private sector organisations, 22% from the development sector, 21% from government and 12% from the education sector. 87% of all participants passed the course successfully, with a commendable 100% pass rate from the Digitisation of Government Payments Task Force, who achieved some of the highest marks overall.

DSC03038
Vincent Mutai at the ceremony

Vincent Mutai from the Task Force, who attained the highest mark of the cohort overall said: “The rich discussions on a range on topics in digital financial services throughout the 12 weeks greatly helped fill my knowledge gaps. Now, I have deeper understanding of how various elements within the digital payments ecosystem interrelate. I also feel more confident engaging in conversations on matters concerning digital financial services.”

Nzomo Mutuku, the Acting Director, Financial and Sectoral Affairs at the National Treasury commented: “This programme was extremely timely as it came at time when the [Kenyan] Government is working to fully digitize government payments and to enhance service delivery. The team from the Government Digital Payments Programme, including myself, who are graduating today will use the knowledge gained to not only accelerate digitisation, but also enhance financial inclusion which remains a key objective of the Government.”

FSD Africa has invested US$1.5 million into DFI, part of which is going towards the provision of scholarships and the convening of in-country “Communities of Practice” in Kenya and elsewhere in Africa. It is expected that these convenings, together with other networking activities, will help to strengthen the learning experience of the students participating in the course.

Commenting on the graduation, Juliet Munro, Director of Inclusive Programmes at FSD Africa said: “This marks a key step forward in building the skills and professional networks required to accelerate the growth and adoption of innovative digital solutions which, in turn, will contribute towards financial inclusion in Africa.”

The second cohort of the course began in July 2016 and is being attended by 180 participants. As demand for the training continues to grow, DFI’s focus will remain on equipping a new cadre of digital finance professionals with the knowledge and skills needed to engage in building digital economies in developing countries across the world.

Financing the frontier: approaching financial sector development in fragile and conflict affected states

From 2016, FSD Africa will increase its focus on inclusive financial sector development in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS).

Working with key partners, it will identify and apply learning from excellent practice so far to support the well-being of the most vulnerable and marginalised on the African continent.

With this in mind, FSD Africa will work with Mercy Corps to produce a focussed think piece on ‘Approaching Inclusive Financial Sector Development in FCAS in Africa’ by June 2016. 

To do this, the team will produce four mini-cases of ‘promising practices’ and will answer the three following questions:

  • Defining and understanding FCAS in Africa. What are FCAS, where are FCAS in Africa, and why do they warrant dedicated attention by the international development community?
  • Defining and understanding financial sector development in African FCAS. What makes financial sector development in FCAS unique and/or the same and why is it important? What is the role of the financial sector in resilience-building and fostering economic opportunity in FCAS?
  • Approaching future financial sector development in African FCAS. What have donors learned so far to improve what they could do in the future? 

The learnings will support smart programming by the FSD network and other financial market facilitation agencies. It will also help to identify future key partners with which to work and a list of priority countries and market failures on which to focus.

If you’d like to learn more about the FSD Africa approach to FCAS or know of a ‘promising practice’ that should be showcased then please contact: Joe Huxley, FSD Africa’s Regional Co-ordinator (joe@fsdafrica.org).

FSD Africa and ILO’s impact insurance facility partner to launch a micro-insurance innovation facility to reach 1 million new clients in sub-Saharan Africa

FSD Africa and ILO’s Impact Insurance Facility have entered into a partnership to promote innovation for micro-insurance products to serve low income households and MSMEs across Sub-Saharan Africa. Insurance penetration in Sub-Saharan Africa remains at dismally low levels with an estimated penetration rate of below 1%. This programme seeks to provide a cushion for low income households to better deal with shocks hence reducing their vulnerability.

FSD Africa will invest USD 1.83 million over 4 years in an innovation laboratory that will be managed by ILO’s Impact Insurance Facility. The innovation laboratory will support five insurance companies and/or distributors, operating in five different countries in sub-Saharan Africa, to develop innovative micro-insurance products that will reach 1 million new clients in 4 years. They will be selected through a competitive call for proposal process that will be managed by the ILO Impact Insurance Facility.

Selected insurance companies and distributors will also ive technical support for change management in order to facilitate the successful implementation of innovative insurance products. This will involve: providing support for changes in organisational structure, capacity building for staff in order to fill the gaps identified from a needs assessment process and the development of business analysis tools that will help to increase client value.

FSD Africa is delighted to partner with ILO’s Impact Insurance Facility to promote innovation for micro-insurance products. The long term goal is to enable the sector to achieve scale with a balance between broad inclusion, sufficient benefits, low premium rates and sustainability.

Paul Musoke, Director, Financial Institutions, FSD Africa

Learnings from the programme will be documented in a training module and toolkit that will be accessible to insurance companies and distributors. The insurance industry will also have access to case studies that will capture learnings from the programme. These documented resources will provide incentive and guidance to other insurance companies in developing micro-insurance products and related delivery channels.

We are excited to work with FSDA to enhance the social and economic development impact of insurance providers in Africa.

Michal Matul, Chief Project Manager of ILO’s Impact Insurance

FSD Africa invests US$7.5m in frontclear to boost interbank lending in SSA

FSD Africa announces a US$7.5m investment in Frontclear, a global guarantee fund which aims to improve interbank liquidity in developing markets.  Frontclear offers a USD guarantee against the local currency value of assets which borrowing banks need to give lending banks as collateral for a loan.

The other investors in Frontclear are EBRD, Proparco, TCX and KfW.  The total capital committed at first close is US$180m. FSD Africa’s investment is in the form of Subordinated Loan Notes, a “first loss” instrument which has helped to crowd in the other investors.  This is FSD Africa’s first capital investment which it is supplementing withUS$1.5m of technical assistance funding.

The interbank market is important because, alongside deposits and the wholesale market (e.g. bonds), it can be a very attractive source of capital for banks.  If interbank markets function well, banks can get access to ously and more flexible terms than in the wholesale markets.

This otherwise ‘dead capital’ can put to use through productive investments in the real economy e.g. lending to African 

Conduits of capital: onshore financial centres and private equity in Africa

With growing interest in Africa as an investment destination, the question arises as to which of its major cities are going to emerge as the region’s financial centres. Which cities are going to be able to attract international capital at scale, as well as growing numbers of financial firms and their technically skilled employees?

This research deals with the sometimes controversial topic of offshore and onshore financial centres. Specifically it asks whether there are onshore centres in sub-Saharan Africa that could rival Mauritius as a domicile for fund administration business.  Mauritius has become the default domicile option for funds and other investment vehicles targeting sub-Saharan Africa.  What made it successful at this kind of business? Does Africa need another Mauritius-like centre or is one enough? What do fund managers and institutional investors really think about the perceptions of offshores centres as places that facilitate capital flight from developing countries, are not transparent and are soft on “harmful” tax practices?

But there is a broader question here.  How can donor funding support the broad financial sector and other reforms that African countries need to make in order to become attractive to African and international investors seeking to invest long-term, patient capital in African businesses?  And where do financial centre strategies fit into that?

This research has been carried out in collaboration with the Emerging Markets Private Equity Association (EMPEA), DFID and the UK’s development finance institution, CDC Group plc.  It contains the results of an online survey of fund managers and institutional investors and also five contrasting “position papers” from experts in the field.

The survey reveals a strong preference among fund managers for offshore structures as well as a high degree of satisfaction among fund managers and institutional investors in Mauritius – but also increasing interest in, and use of, onshore centres.

Financial centre strategies are an expression of a country’s economic direction of travel and can be a powerful branding instrument. These strategies symbolise a country’s support for the development of an enabling environment that encourages economic diversification and innovation.

But, as the research suggests, countries also need to “get real” about the challenges involved in setting up credible financial centres.  They need to set proper targets, be accountable for the delivery of these targets and ensure that real political capital is invested.