Country: Uganda

A review of some of Africa’s housing finance markets

Overview

Across Africa, the residential investment opportunity is increasingly driving conversations about economic growth. While the definition of who is middle class and how many such households there are continue, the fact of Africa’s rising population and rapid urbanisation is palpable in its cities where the inadequate housing conditions of the majority are obvious.

For every problem, there is an opportunity for a solution, and in increasingly creative ways, this is what Africa’s housing investors are finding.

Most investment funds currently active were initiated when the African growth trajectory was on an upward curve. The past year has been challenging, however. Still among the fastest growing continents, Africa has seen its growth and development prospects seriously challenged by global economic pressures, the commodities downturn and the slowing Chinese economy. Where the prospects of oil and gas discoveries dominated the news five years ago, in 2016 it is their loss in value ng governments reconsider their economic development strategies. The key challenge in this environment, is economic diversification. Can housing contribute towards that opportunity?

Governments can contribute significantly to a developer’s ability to deliver affordable housing at scale, by paying attention to the rough spots along the housing value chain: the availability of land, its servicing (especially water and electricity), and its registration;
the availability of domestic building materials and a functioning construction sector; the time it takes to get administrative approvals for the building process, and the cost of such approvals; the taxation, finance and macro-economic framework; and the functioning of the labour market, among so many other factors.

Read full report from”http://housingfinanceafrica.org”>CAHF here.,

CBA: Coaching Culture for Business Case Study

Commercial Bank of Africa Limited (CBA) is the largest privately-owned bank in East Africa, with representation in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. In addition to providing services to the Corporate and Personal Banking market segments there is now also strong focus on targeting the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) segment.

Executive coaching is the delivery of structured one-to-one support, usually by conversation, by professional executive coaches to enable leaders to achieve specific organisational or leadership objectives over a defined period; and it closes the gap between potential and performance and enables the individual to optimise their contribution to the organisation.

This publication presents the case of a leading African financial services firm, CBA, that has made the strategic decision to invest intentionally in the development of a coaching culture. CBA’s leadership is determined that a culture of employee engagement, empowerment and the use of coaching in leadership and management will enhance employee productivity and contribute to business performance.

Harbingers of doom? bank failures in Africa – how to interpret these

Yesterday, Zambia’s central bank announced it had taken over a commercial bank, Intermarket, after the latter failed to come up with the capital it needed to satisfy new minimum capital requirements. Three weeks ago, a Mozambican bank – Nosso Banco – had its licence cancelled, less than two months after another Mozambican bank, Moza Banco, was placed under emergency administration.

At the end of October, the Bank of Tanzania stepped in to replace the management at Twiga Bancorp, a government-owned financial institution which was reported to have negative capital of TSh21 billion.  A week before that, just over the border in Uganda, Crane Bank, with its estimated 500,000 customers, was taken over by the central bank, having become “seriously undercapitalised”. In DR Congo, the long-running saga of BIAC, the country’s third largest bank, continued in 2016, forced to limit cash withdrawals after the termination of a credit line from the central bank. And in Kenya, Chase Bank collapsed in April, bars after the failure of Imperial.

How are we to interpret this? It seems that 2016 is the year in which latent fragility in Africa’s banking sectors is being laid bare.  After years in which observers have favourably contrasted the relative stability of African banking with the financial sector chaos in Europe and the US, it seems that three critical perils – mismanagement, political interference and economic woes – are conspiring to transform the landscape of African banking into a decidedly treacherous place for depositors and investors.

We have had remarkably few bank failures in Africa in recent years and yet this sudden uptick in stories like Crane and Chase, against a backdrop of economic challenges in many places, raises the question as to whether there is worse to come.

Mismanagement and/or political interference have been at the root of most bank collapses over the past few decades. Martin Brownbridge’s grimly fascinating analysi”https://fsdafrica.org/knowledge-hub/blog/harbingers-of-doom-bank-failures-in-africa-how-to-interpret-these/#_ftn1″ name=”_ftnref1″>[1] on this subject from 1998 concluded that “moral hazard, with the adoption of high-risk lending strategies, in some cases involving insider lending” was behind most of the bank collapses in the 1990s. This certainly resonates today. Catastrophic lapses in governance rather than economic malaise are alleged to be behind the recent Kenyan bank failures (although their shareholders and directors vigorously refute this) – but how else can you explain why a small number of banks fail when the sector as a whole has been returning well over 20% on its equity for the past several years?

There are some excellent programmes like “http://www.centerforfinancialinclusion.org/programs-a-projects/abf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Accions’s Africa Board Fellowship Program, which aims to strengthen capacity at financial institutions because their promoters understand that weak governance undermines trust in the financial system and is therefore very bad for financial inclusion. But it is one thing to know what you’re supposed to do as a bank board director – quite another to actually do it.

Each bank failure seems to have its own special story – and we derive comfort from this. It is somehow reassuring to think that that might be the case because the prospect of a system-wide failure is so awful.

And each country context has particular features that impinge on the stability of the financial system. There are deep concerns in Kenya, for example, that the recent imposition of interest rate caps is going to result in a very messy period of bank failures and/or consolidation.

But are there common patterns that we should be taking note of?  Is there a system-wide issue that we should be facing up to?

Well, one pattern might be positive – that central banks are intervening more, and more quickly, to weed out the miscreants, less cowed by the politicians than they might have been in the past and more concerned to protect their well-earned professional reputations. Another is that central banks are finally implementing the increases in minimum capital requirements which many have been talking about for years with the inevitable intended consequence that some banks will be forced to get out of the market.

These might be two good reasons why we are seeing more collapses. You could say that’s excellent news for the future of African banking. But perhaps only to a point. There is still the risk that the cumulative effect of bank failures as a result of zealous supervisory action causes a loss of faith in the entire system resulting in mass panic and the withdrawal of deposits and credit lines.

Also, the inevitable result of this would be fewer, bigger banks which may have negative consequences for competition and access – altht worth pointing out that Tanzania, which has 55 commercial banks, still only manages to bank around 12% of its adult population (FinScope).

The more concerning issue is the impact of underlying economic weakness. Leaving aside the paradox that some of these bank failures are taking place in economies that are growing quite fast (Kenya and Tanzania forecasting 6-7% GDP growth), lower commodity prices and their pervasive impact across African economies are going to make life much tougher for banks – especially if they are poorly managed and have political skeletons in their cupboards.

One problem we have, especially when economic conditions are changing fast and for the worse (as in Mozambique), is that data is often out of date and is not sufficiently disaggregated. So, when we look at Africa as a whole, or even the banking system of one country as a whole, the averages we tend to look at create a blithely benign picture which masks dramatic variations.

So, non-performing loans (NPLs) across Africa up to014 were a little over 5% but NPLs in Ghana were more like 11-12%. NPLs in Tanzania are currently a little over 8%, yet Twiga Bancorp’s NPL’s were – unbelievably – at 34% in early 2015, according to media reports.

We think the African banking sector is in for a rocky ride in 2017 and 2018 and, in the short term, this is not good news for the real economy. However, one industry that is set to grow, surely, is central banking supervision.

“https://fsdafrica.org/knowledge-hub/blog/harbingers-of-doom-bank-failures-in-africa-how-to-interpret-these/#_ftnref1” name=”_ftn1″>[1] Brownbridge, M (1998): “Financial distress in local banks in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia: Causes and implications for regulatory policy” Development Policy Review, vol. 16, no.

East Africa crowdfunding landscape study

This study examines the crowdfunding landscape in four East African countries (Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda), and compares it with the crowdfunding ecosystems in South Africa and the United Kingdom. Allied Crowds forecasts crowdfunding to grow by 177% from 2015 to 2016 in East Africa. Kenya is the leader among the four countries ($46.7m forecast for 2016), followed by Uganda ($30.9m), Tanzania ($16.0m), and Rwanda ($9.4m). This compares with a forecast of $20.6m to be raised in South Africa for 2016.

Crowdfunding in motion: seven things we learned about P2P markets in East Africa

Less than a month ago, on 15 June 2016, the crowdfunding industry in East Africa came together for the first time in Nairobi. This East African Crowdfunding Indaba & Marketplace was co-hosted by FSD Africa and the Kenya Capital Markets Authority, and attended by 65 representative from across the crowdfunding industry in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda.

But, what did we learn? We boil it down to seven key points:

  • East African crowdfunding markets are on the move. Crowdfunding markets in East Africa remain nascent, but are growing. According to forthcoming research by Allied Crowds and FSD Africa, crowdfunding platforms (donation, rewards, debt and equity) raised $37.2 million in 2015 in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. By the end of Q1 2016, this figure reached $17.8 million – a 170% year-on-year increase. Today, there are no platforms located in Tanzania, 1 in Rwanda, 1 in Uganda, 3 in Kenya, 10 in South Africa, with a further 55 located beyond these countries, but doing business within them. Ths platform landscaping report is scheduled for publication in July 2016.
  • East Africa’s platforms report promising progress. Since its launch in September 2012, M-Changa has raised $900,000 through 46,000 donations to 6,129 fundraisers. Popular uses of M-Changa donations include: medical expenses (24%), business activities (24%), education expenses (12%), and funeral expenses (7%). The platform also reports 100% year-on-year growth rates. Since the launch of its pilot phase in December 2015, Pesa Zetu has dispersed c.1,200 loans via mobile phones to low income Kenyans – of loan sizes between $20 and $100 – to test its credit models, processes and technology platform. So far, Pesa Zetu has dispersed c.$59,275 in total. Scale-up in Kenya is planned for Q4 2016. Since its inception in March 2015, LelapaFund has screened over 350 SMEs in East Africa and beyond, and engaged over 30 in due diligence and investment readiness processes in Kenya. Pending regulatory approval, it hopes to open access to its first deals on the platform in 2016. During the event, each platform reported regional ambitions.
  • Global crowdfunding markets are growing fast but also evolving. According to primary and secondary research by CGAP, the finance raised by crowdfunding platforms worldwide increased from $2.7 billion in 2012 to an estimated $34 billion in 2015. This figure is expected to reach $96 billion by 2025 in developing countries alone. Today, there are approximately 1,250 active platforms globally. They typically fall into four typologies (donation, rewards, debt and equity), but hybrids are fast emerging. In the UK, up to 40% of the capital raised by P2P platforms is institutional in its origin.
  • East Africa’s MSMEs express a demand for alternative finance, but they’re not always investment-ready or able to locate financiers. According to LelapaFund research, c.45% of Kenyan start-ups sampled require between $10,000 and $50,000 growth capital, while c.40% require between $50,000 and $250,000 for expansion/export (22%), marketing (23%) and product development (29%). For Kenyan SMEs, c.50% of firms sampled require between $100,000 to $500,000 for expansion/export (40%), marketing (21%) and product development (29%). Both start-ups and SMEs received more capital from friends and family than banks. Vava Coffee reported difficulties locating and accessing sources of non-bank finance, especially as a female entrepreneur. The firm also highlighted the importance of data and evidence when raising finance because it demonstrates a track record. LelapaFund has committed significant resources to identify investment-ready SMEs for its platform. Of 350 Kenyan SMEs screened, less than 10% proceeded to due diligence phase. Financial literacy training for SMEs, low cost due diligence models, improved signposting of SMEs to sources of investment and the use of Company Registry data were suggested as means to address a lack of investment-ready SMEs in the region.
  • There are both commercial and development opportunities for crowdfunding platforms in East Africa. Through their use of technology, crowdfunding platforms have the potential to mobilise and allocate capital more cheaply and quickly than the banking industry and development agencies. This could lead to the disintermediation of both through increased efficiency and competition, as well as increased access to finance for low income individuals and growing companies. Where mobile phone technology is currently used to provide micro-savings and micro-credit in East Africa, interest rate spreads remain significant – c.3% p.a. for saving, and c.90% p.a. to lend. This presents a market opportunity, particularly for P2P debt finance platforms.
  • Crowdfunding risks and the regulatory environment. Globally, many crowdfunding markets are not yet regulated. The unique nature of crowdfunding models means that they straddle traditional payments, banking and securities laws. In jurisdictions where financial industry regulators are not consolidated into a single unified authority, platforms may also straddle regulating departments. In some countries, such as the New Zealand, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States, crowdfunding is subject to special tailored regimes. In the UK, for example, the Financial Conduct Authority has developed a Regulatory Sandbox, which provides a safe space for innovative firms to test products and services with real consumers in a real environment, without incurring all of the normal regulatory consequences of engaging in this activity. In East Africa, there is no specific regime for crowdfunding regulation. Instead, sections of existing banking and securities legislation are used, but are open to interpretation. However, there is evidence of innovation. In Kenya, for example, Section 12A‪ of the Capital Markets Act provides a safe space for innovations to grow before being subject to the full regulatory regime. During the event, the Kenya Capital Markets AuthorityRwanda Capital Markets AuthorityUganda Capital Markets Authority, and CGAP’s consumer protection specialist expressed cautious optimism about the future of crowdfunding markets in East Africa, noting particularly risks around: inexperienced borrowers and investors, digital fraud, data protection and non-performing loans/investments.
  • There’s appetite to do business and to learn more from across East Africa. A total of 65 participants attended the Indaba & Marketplace from all corners of the East African market: a) supply-side (crowdfunding platforms, impact investors and micro-finance institutions such as Pesa ZetuM-ChangaLelapaFundNovastar VenturesLetshego Holdings), b) demand-side (SMEs and consumer protection specialists such as Vava CoffeeEcoZoomBurn), c) business service providers (data analytics firms, law firms, market intelligence firms and technology providers such as Anjarwalla & KhannaIBMZege TechnologiesAllied CrowdsDigital Data DivideOpen Capital AdvisorsGenesis AnalyticsIntellecap), d) rule-makers (regulators and policy makers such as the Kenya Capital Markets AuthorityRwanda Capital Markets AuthorityUganda Capital Markets AuthorityUK Financial Conduct Authority), and e) donor agencies (market facilitators, think tanks and aid agencies such as Access to Finance RwandaCGAP,  FSD KenyaFSD TanzaniaFSD UgandaUN Women).

So, what’s next?

First of all, for more facts and figures, please find all the presentations delivered during the crowdfunding indaba and marketplace here.

Second, we’re keen to move beyond discussion towards new partnerships and deal-making. With this in mind, please find a full list of participants here. If you’d like specific contact details then email Fundi Ngundi (fundi@fsdafrica.org), who will ask permission from the counterpart before connecting you.

Third, through partnership, FSD Africa will continue to support the development of crowdfunding markets in East Africa. The Allied Crowds platform landscaping research is scheduled for publication in July 2016. A regulator support exercise has been launched and will conclude in September 2016. It will be led by Anjarwalla & Khanna and the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Where beneficial to the poor and the wider crowdfunding market, FSD Africa will also provide light touch support to platforms themselves. If there’s demand, there could be scope for a follow-up Indaba and Marketplace in early 2017. If you’d like to collaborate then please be in touch.

Lastly, thank you to all the speakers, panelists, facilitators and participants for your lively contributions last week. Albeit steadily, crowdfunding markets are on the move in East Africa!

Over 1,000 senior and mid-level executives to benefit from FSD Africa’s USD1.14 million grant to strathmore business school

FSD Africa is pleased to announce that it has signed a USD 1.14 million grant agreement with Strathmore Business School – SBS to develop and deliver training to over 1,000 senior and mid-level executives in the financial sector in Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda. Funded by the UK’s Department for International Development, FSD Africa supports financial sector development to help reduce poverty in sub-Saharan Africa.

This grant builds on FSDA’s strategy of supporting the emergence of strong centres of excellence that provide best practice training to financial sector professionals.

Strathmore Business School has for the past 10 years demonstrated its ability to deliver transformative executive development programmes in Kenya which has positively impacted the business community. We are delighted to partner with SBS to spread this success into the region.

Julias Alego, FSD Africa’s Director of Professional Education

Since 2013 SBS has trained over 200 senior and middle level managers in Uganda under the Uganda Leadership Development Academy – ULDA. This grant will support the expansion of the programme into Tanzania and Rwanda until the end of 2018. It will essentially be used to develop faculty, course material, case studies and limited scholarships to pioneering financial institutions for the programmes.

Over the next three years, it is expected that the target financial institutions to which these course participants belong will develop innovative products and deliver effective service to reach out to up to 5 million of existing and new customers in underserved market segments.

This partnership with FSDA will further enable Strathmore Business School to expand its leadership development programmes in the region and thus reach out to more executives and change livelihoods. We are excited with this partnership and look forward to working closely with FSDA to change lives.

Dr. George Njenga, Strathmore Business School Dean

Beyond the funding: creating a lasting market for financial consumer protection training

Between August 2014 and December 2014, the Uganda Institute of Banking and Financial Services (UIBFS) led a project to embed the Bank of Uganda’s (BOU) Financial Consumer Protection Guidelines (FCPG) in the day-to-day operations of the 31 Supervised Financial Institutions (SFI) in Uganda.

The project aimed to increase the capacity of Ugandan training firms and SFI Human Resource teams beyond a critical minimum threshold to enable the delivery of financial consumer protection (FCP) training to SFIs in Uganda on a lasting basis. This would then lead to long-term implementation of the FCPGs in all branches of SFIs to consumers across Uganda.

To support this process, Financial Sector Deepening Africa (FSDA) competitively procured UIBFS for £105,000 to lead a consortium of five FCP-enabled Ugandan training firms (Corporate Concepts, Demis, Komunda Investments Ltd, Sonamoney and UIBFS).

In total, 12 FCP qualified Ugandan trainers used bespoke FCPg materials to train 1,038 staff at 575 branches of 31 SFIs in all regions of Uganda. A total of 1,004 (96.7%) participants were awarded certificates for successful completion of the course. The training was delivered on time, reached 86.5% of the intended 1,200 participants, and was highly rated by SFI staff participants, SFI Human Resource Managers and BOU.

Significantly, a review in February 2015 (three months after the delivery of the training) indicated initial, positive signs of market-system change. For example, all five participating training firms intend to provide an FCP training module on a commercial basis as a result of this project. A total of 4 of the 12 surveyed SFIs indicated they plan to pay for the outsourcing of FCP training to local Uganda training providers. Finally, BOU expressed confidence that supervisory and public pressure would increase the demand for FCP training among SFIs into the future.

Looking beyond Uganda, this project has thePtrong>potential to provide a model for replication in other sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. It demonstrates how donor-funded market facilitators (GIZ & FSD Africa) can build on new Central Bank FCP regulations by putting in place the critical building blocks for the development of a local FCP training market.

Looking towards next steps, a repeat evaluation is planned for December 2015 to determine whether lasting market-system change is likely to be achieved. In the meantime, FSD Africa is working with BOU, GIZ and a Ugandan communications firm to deliver a public awareness raising campaign around financial consumer protection. The aim is to increase demand for high quality SFI customer service, which will likely lead to increased demand by SFIs for FCP training. FSD Africa will also work with GIZ and BOU to disseminate lessons learned across SSA and identify opportunities for enhanced supervision to catalyse the development of the training market in Uganda. Finally, the conversion of learning materials into an e-learning module is also under discussion.

According to GIZ Uganda: “the FCP training programme has beenshining example of what a committed regulator can achieve in the financial inclusion space. Working with like-minded development partners such as FSD Africa and local implementers such as UIBFS, this project has developed and implemented a carefully designed, sustainable approach to the long-term mainstreaming FCP within the Ugandan financial sector. FSD Africa’s support has been invaluable as a catalyst to scale-up and ensure the project has lasting outcomes. Without FSD Africa building on progress made by BOU and GIZ, the necessary momentum to support Uganda’s financial sector to deliver better financial services to consumers in a fairer and more transparent way may not have been achieve

“Beyond the funding: creating a lasting market for financial consumer protection training”

Between August 2014 and December 2014, the Uganda Institute of Banking and Financial Services (UIBFS) led a project to embed the Bank of Uganda’s (BOU) Financial Consumer Protection Guidelines (FCPG) in the day-to-day operations of the 31 Supervised Financial Institutions (SFI) in Uganda.

The project aimed to increase the capacity of Ugandan training firms and SFI Human Resource teams beyond a critical minimum threshold to enable the delivery of financial consumer protection (FCP) training to SFIs in Uganda on a lasting basis. This would then lead to long-term implementation of the FCPGs in all branches of SFIs to consumers across Uganda.

To support this process, Financial Sector Deepening Africa (FSDA) competitively procured UIBFS for £105,000 to lead a consortium of five FCP-enabled Ugandan training firms (Corporate Concepts, Demis, Komunda Investments Ltd, Sonamoney and UIBFS).

In total, 12 FCP qualified Ugandan trainers used bespoke FCPg materials to train 1,038 staff at 575 branches of 31 SFIs in all regions of Uganda. A total of 1,004 (96.7%) participants were awarded certificates for successful completion of the course. The training was delivered on time, reached 86.5% of the intended 1,200 participants, and was highly rated by SFI staff participants, SFI Human Resource Managers and BOU.

Significantly, a review in February 2015 (three months after the delivery of the training) indicated initial, positive signs of market-system change. For example, all five participating training firms intend to provide an FCP training module on a commercial basis as a result of this project. A total of 4 of the 12 surveyed SFIs indicated they plan to pay for the outsourcing of FCP training to local Uganda training providers. Finally, BOU expressed confidence that supervisory and public pressure would increase the demand for FCP training among SFIs into the future.

Looking beyond Uganda, this project has thePtrong>potential to provide a model for replication in other sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. It demonstrates how donor-funded market facilitators (GIZ & FSDA) can build on new Central Bank FCP regulations by putting in place the critical building blocks for the development of a local FCP training market.

Looking towards next steps, a repeat evaluation is planned for December 2015 to determine whether lasting market-system change is likely to be achieved. In the meantime, FSDA is working with BOU, GIZ and a Ugandan communications firm to deliver a public awareness raising campaign around financial consumer protection. The aim is to increase demand for high quality SFI customer service, which will likely lead to increased demand by SFIs for FCP training. FSDA will also work with GIZ and BOU to disseminate lessons learned across SSA and identify opportunities for enhanced supervision to catalyse the development of the training market in Uganda. Finally, the cversion of learning materials into an e-learning module is also under discussion.

According to GIZ Uganda: “the FCP training programme has been a shining example of what a committed regulator can achieve in the financial inclusion space. Working with like-minded development partners such as FSDA and local implementers such as UIBFS, this project has developed and implemented a carefully designed, sustainable approach to the long-term mainstreaming FCP within the Ugandan financial sector. FSDA’s support has been invaluable as a catalyst to scale-up and ensure the project has lasting outcomes.Without FSDA building on progress made by BOU and GIZ, the necessary momentum to support Uganda’s financial sector to deliver better financial services to consumers in a fairer and more transparent way may not have been ach